When I was a teenager I lived at home with my parents.
Every election I’d watch Mum and Dad go through the same palaver.
Mum would wait until Dad got home from work.
Then they’d walk to the polling station.
Dad would always vote Conservative, Mum would always vote Labour.
Then they’d come home and Mum would make Dad’s tea while he read the paper.
They never discussed politics.
But every year it was the same: Mum voted Labour and Dad voted Conservative.
One year I said to Mum, why do you both bother voting?
All you do is cancel each other’s vote out.
Why don’t you both just stay at home and don’t vote?
It will have exactly the same effect.
First Mum was quiet, then she was angry.
She said “We’ve just had a war where men died for our right to vote.
Because of them we all have a vote where other countries don’t.
That’s why we go along to vote.
We don’t just go along to manipulate the result.
We go along to exercise the freedom those men fought for.
It doesn’t matter how we vote, that’s up to each person.
But what matters is that we do vote.
Because people fought and gave their lives for that.
And if we can’t even be bothered to walk down to the polling booths, well I think that’s a terrible thing.”
After Mum said that I felt quite humble.
I had never seen voting as a demonstration of freedom.
Like most of my generation, I just saw it as a way of getting the result I wanted.
Of manipulating the votes so the right government got in.
But Mum didn’t see that.
For her, the important thing was that, whoever won it was chosen by a free people with everyone having an equal say.
The poor just as much as the rich.
One person, one vote.
Her and Dad didn’t agree on what would be the best government.
But that was okay, so long as everyone had a say in it.
So long as everyone was free to choose.
So long as it was fair.
And every time there’s an election nowadays I think of my mum.
And I think how different it is.
I see The Daily Mail versus The Guardian and all the name-calling.
I see everyone acting as if a vote for the other side is a betrayal of any human decency.
As if the people who vote the other way are ignorant and vile.
And I realise we don’t have democracy in my mum’s sense anymore.
We have football supporters.
My team is perfect your team is shit, in all circumstances.
It isn’t rational, it’s purely emotional.
After the last election I saw a Facebook post from someone I like.
A very intelligent, very senior person in our industry.
It said “If you are a friend of mine and you voted for the vile scumbag Tories, please UNfriend me now. I don’t want to know you.”
I was quite surprised.
This was someone who went to Oxbridge.
Someone who had the best education in this country.
Someone who’s run some of the best ad agencies in London.
But someone who doesn’t want to play democracy unless they get their own way.
My mum never had an Oxbridge education.
But I think I prefer her concept of democracy.
Well said Dave. I recommend Tom Bingham’s The Rule of Law to anyone who wants to explore this philosophy in a slightly more legalistic/constitutional direction.
I think that the problem is the infantilisation of politics, for want of a better word (and there must be one). My voting intentions in the upcoming referendum make me a “Europhile”. I’m not. But because my analysis is that remaining is by far the lesser of two evils I am categorized that way because the categories are only black or white – Arsenal or Spurs, Millwall or West Ham. I’m not allowed to be the impartial observer just hoping for a decent game and that, I think, impoverishes us all.
Sorry it’s a long rant – you touched a nerve 😉
Thanks Jonathan, I agree.
In the abstract, I cannot disagree with this column. But the reality (here in the States) is that we have one party that will not be collegial, that employs scorched-earth tactics to get what they want, and that routinely denigrates their opponents, then offers up candidates who do not objectively have any qualifications for high office other than to always answer the phone when wealthy supporters call.
Put another way, how keen would your Mum have been on voting if your Dad’s Tory party had been run by Oswald Mosely? There are lines that have to be drawn and that when crossed, destroy the relevancy and value of traditional institutions.
Your friend’s thought gets even worst when we realize he works in advertising. You know, I like to think that a great property of our industry is the exercise of looking to the other (person, side, belief) and absorve its opinions. We live for that. And the opposite of it is to put our views down the throats and minds of everyone – what looks like tyranny and not a good communication.
I take your point Mark.
But I think you either trust the democratic process or you don’t.
If Trump gets elected it will be because the majority of Americans want him.
We may not agree, but that’s democracy.
Dear Mr. Trott, I believe that your parent’s philosophy was indicative of a golden period in our nations history. In the 1979 general election I had the opportunity to view the approved and accepted concepts for the advertisement campaign for the Labour Party. At that exact moment I believed they were destined to lose the forthcoming election. Recently, about 6 months after the last election, I asked my daughter (a soft leftist) whom she planned to vote for in 5 years time? She replied “There’s no real credible alternative at the moment, is there dad”. I think that things have unfortunately changed drastically since those days when your good mum and dad voted for their preferred government. Hence the style of the Facebook post you mentioned unfortunately becomes more and more “the norm”.
Great stuff.
The football analogy is perfect.
Everyone’s identity seems to hinge on hating the opposition.
I support Spurs, so I must hate Arsenal.
I support Sunderland, so I must hate Newcastle.
I support Australia, so I must hate England.
I support Team Corbin, so I must hate Team Cameron.
I support Team Muslim, so I must hate Team Jew.
Hating what you’re not seems to have become essential to being what you are.
Sad.
Name & shame that pinko, candy-assed, limp-wrested, Belsize Park-loving, quadrangle-hopping, picnic-in-a-punt faux man of the people so we can go round and ‘Unfriend’ him in the true spirit of modern democratic debate.
£20 says it was Steve Henry
Sorry James you’d lose, although I’m sure Steve would agree with it
Dave, your reply to Mark is correct as far as it goes. And your Mom was right that voting is an important cornerstone of democracy. I would only like to add that there are other factors that go into creating a civil society in which democracy can function. You need respect for the rule of law. You need some degree of freedom of thought and expression. You need a foundational belief in and respect for the life and rights of other humans as humans, irrespective of their race, religion, gender, sexuality, or background.
When democracy occurs in the absence of those bedrock principles, it can become oppression. Mob rule. Totalitarianism of the majority. So if my countrymen (and countrywomen) elect Donald Trump, fair play. If they elect Donald Trump and during his presidency he abandons the rule of law (for instance, by discriminating against Muslims in ways clearly banned in the US Constitution) and the freedom of the press (as in the case of the journalist who was just assaulted by a member of Trump’s campaign team) then he is himself a threat to democracy.
I truly hope, and believe, that it will never come to that.
Best wishes,
Karin Robinson
Former Vice Chair, Democrats Abroad, UK
208 Regional Field Director for Americans Abroad, Democratic National Committee
Proud Human Being
I absolutely agree, Karin.
And I wasn’t advocating supplication to a despotic government.
If a democratically elected leader ceases to abide by the rules of democracy then he ceases to be protected by them.
In which case John Locke put it best:
“whenever the Legislators endeavor to take away, and destroy the Property of the People, or to reduce them to Slavery under Arbitrary Power, they put themselves into a state of War with the People, who are thereupon absolved from any farther Obedience, and are left to the common Refuge, which God hath provided for all Men, against Force and Violence. Whensoever therefore the Legislative shall transgress this fundamental Rule of Society; and either by Ambition, Fear, Folly or Corruption, endeavor to grasp themselves, or put into the hands of any other an Absolute Power over the Lives, Liberties, and Estates of the People; By this breach of Trust they forfeit the Power, the People had put into their hands, for quite contrary ends, and it devolves to the People, who have a Right to resume their original Liberty.”
John Locke and John Stuart Mill were so far ahead of their age, philosophically speaking!
Karin, did you know the phrase “Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” in your Declaration of Independence came from John Locke?
It was originally “Life, liberty and property” but it was changed because the government would need to take some ‘property’ in tax.
Also, maybe you already know this Karin.
If not you may find it interesting: http://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/view-dave-trott-reality-creates-brands/1386561
Hey Dave
Huge fan of your thinking and writing
Trying to get hold of the kindle edition of 1+1=3 (I have the rest already) but for some reason the kindle edition is not available on the amazon.com site only the uk site (And ofc amazon wont let me send the uk version across)
Will this be available on the .com version?
Also would happily purchase the file directly from your site as a digital purchase just an fyi !
Cant wait to read it. You have a style of writing i’m incredibly envious of 😀
Daniel
Hi Daniel,
I’ve forwarded your email to the publisher.
Meanwhile the publisher sells an E book on their website, I don’t know if that helps:
https://www.panmacmillan.com/authors/dave-trott/one-plus-one-equals-three
Hi Daniel,
The publisher has checked it out and says it is available here:
http://www.amazon.com/One-Plus-Equals-Three-Masterclass-ebook/dp/B00SN936XS/ref=sr_1_1_twi_kin_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1458059077&sr=8-1&keywords=one+plus+one+equals+three.
My wife, an Australian, often berates me for not voting (it’s compulsory in Australia). If there was a box entitled ‘None of the above’, I’d gladly attend the polls. I refuse to ‘vote tactically’, it’s just as bad. It’s not the lack of effort, it’s the lack of decent candidates and the absence of a truly democratic system. Current politics have betrayed people like your (and my) parents.
I agree Jon.
I wish I had an answer