A few years back I was giving a talk in Berlin to a group of business people.
Being Germans, they were taking thorough notes.
Afterwards one of them approached me and opened his pad.
He said “Excuse me, you mentioned a demographic that we are not familiar with.
Can you tell me please what is this: “punters”?”
I then had an awkward five minutes explaining that it was just cockney slang.
In my speech, I’d been guilty of using sloppy language.
Germans use language very precisely and I don’t.
I wasn’t using language to communicate, I was using what was comfortable.
Consequently I knew what I meant, but my audience didn’t.
That’s sloppy language.
That’s not the way to communicate.
But that’s exactly what we do in our business, when we use jargon.
We don’t speak to communicate, we speak to make ourselves feel comfortable.
We think we’re being impressive, but actually it’s just sloppy language.
We can either use language to invite people into a conversion, or we can use language to keep people out.
And that’s what jargon is designed to do, keep people out.
To make it seem that our job is only for the trained and the educated.
But if advertising is about anything, it should be about communicating with ordinary people.
So why is the sort of language we use the exact opposite?
It’s designed to give us the status of doctors, scientists, lawyers, pilots, engineers.
Well those professions may need technical language, but we don’t.
In truth, our jargon is designed just to make us feel good, not for communication.
The best definition of communication is as follows: “It’s not enough to take responsibility for speaking correctly – we must take responsibility for being heard correctly.”
So the start point should be using easily understood language.
But we don’t do that.
We don’t do that, because our language is designed to obfuscate, to confuse.
To make people think we know something they don’t.
To make our job seem as technical as doctors, scientists, lawyers, pilots, engineers.
So we disguise what we are saying with complicated words and expressions that only the cognoscenti will understand.
Language that says “If you understand this you can be in the club. If you don’t you can’t.”
So we use language to exclude people.
Albert Einstein said “If you can’t explain it to an eleven-year-old then you haven’t really understood it.”
Most people in advertising couldn’t explain their jobs in language an eleven-year-old would understand.
So, according to Einstein, they don’t understand what they’re doing.
And they use language to disguise that fact.
If we had to use ordinary language, it would soon become clear who did and didn’t know what they were doing.
The best people would be people who could describe their job in language anyone could understand.
But that’s not who we’re employing nowadays.
We’re employing people whose skill is solely in covering up the fact that they don’t understand what they’re doing.
They may not know much about advertising, but they are proficient in sloppy language.
Hi Dave,
Point 2 of your D&Ad Pamphlet entitled
HOW TO GET YOUR FIRST JOB IN ADVERTISING:
KEY
1. What is the product?
2. Who are you talking to?
3. What are you trying to say?
The other things I remember are:
A. The analogies with shirt advertising.
B. something about ‘I’m writing this book because I’m fed up of telling students the same thing again and again and again.’
Well remembered Kev.
Not a lot of advertising does points 1 – 3 nowadays
I’m a copywriter and my friend is a consultant.
He can never understand what I do no matter how I explain.
I’ve said, “you saw the British airways smiling face commercial? Or those Economist posters. Well, ever wondered how those ads came about? I mean someone must’ve created them, right?”
And still he can’t understand.
Epic fail for the copywriter, then.
Classic:
http://www.planningaboveandbeyond.com/wp-content/uploads/How-to-get-your-first-job-in-advertising-Dave-Trott.pdf
One of the things I’ve started doing at work is asking people to explain what they mean when they speak in jargon. I say, “I don’t know what that means. Can you give me an example?” Nine times out of 10, they can’t. I think that’s how you call bullshit on someone. Relentlessly ask for clarification.
Great explanation of what’s wrong with the Democratic party. Not only do they use jargon, they reinvent it every four years to make sure no one knows what they’re talking about.
as Ed said, “monosyllables work best”. so true.
Hi Dave,
It just goes to prove short, clear, succinct communication sticks, stays and becomes embedded.
Hi George,
Here is a translation of their explanations. I do hope it clarifies matters:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lTMiQsMH1g
So, what are “punters”? 🙁
Adriana,
“Punters” is cockney slang for ordinary people.
You might need to explain what cockney slang is Dave.
Hi Dave,
I wish to invite you to Keynote at ad:tech New Delhi, on March 8-9, 2018. Our theme for this year is ‘WELCOME TO THE POST-ADVERTISING ERA,’ where Creativity, Technology, Emotion & Innovation collide.
ad:tech is the #1 digital marketing in India and our 6000+ audience would love to hear your thoughts on technology and creativity. I hope this is of interest, and I am reaching out much in advance to block your calendar.
Please email me on how we can proceed on this, and I will send you more details on the event.
warm regards,
Shiney Eapen
Comexposium LLP
Shiney Eapen,
I emailed you a couple of days ago, just checking that you got it
dave
Great stuff Dave.
With “punter” I think you’ve touched on another problem there for any copywriter: assuming that particular colloquialisms are universally understood!
Wasn’t it Churchill who said that us an the Americans are two nations divided by a common language?
On the rare occasions I write for a US audience, I have a habit of reading the copy back in my head in the style of Groucho Marx to see if it sounds right.
Ditto Paul Hogan for clients in Australia.
It’s a surprisingly successful strategy.
Hi Dave,
Any chance you might write something (for punters) on the power of emotion over statistics… Sure detail is vital, but more and more clients want that over emotion, yet buy when their feelings spike. I recently asked the CEO of a global real estate firm why he drove a Porsche 911 – he spent three minutes telling me. Then I pointed out he had talked at length about the experience, sensation and emotions. Not once about the gear ratio, torque or fuel efficiency. Is this because he truly didn’t realise???
Or, you could just point me to your archive: THE TEN CONDIMENTS OF ADVERTISING
POSTED ON June 26, 2017. Mmmnnn food for thought!
Hi Hugh,
I think this ios relevant to your example with the Porsche:
http://davetrott.co.uk/2008/07/desire-and-permission/
Pingback: Brexit and copywriting: 7 reasons why feelings Trump facts (updated 2018) | Copywriter, Leeds
The reason for the obfuscation isn’t to confuse. Or to make people think we know something they don’t. It’s because so many people in advertising are too chickenshit to tell the client what’s really on their minds. The simple truth loses clients. Clients expect us to lie, for any number of reasons. They’re used to it. They expect it. The truth, no matter how politely delivered, is reviled. The emperor has no clothes, and we are fools for saying what is plainly evident. It’s a simple case of class warfare. That’s why more and more companies are bringing their marketing in house. They think that even they can do what we do. And not enough of us have the courage to tell them that they don’t.