In 1999 a lorry driver, Michael Rayner, headed for London.
He joined the M1 at Junction 13, but by Junction 10 he’d dialled 999 emergency on his mobile.
He told the police his accelerator had jammed and his lorry was unstoppable, going flat out at 80 mph.
He couldn’t stop because the brakes had failed.
That’s 38 tons of fully loaded truck thundering down the motorway, capable of mowing down anything that gets in front of it.
Emergency services told him to turn the engine off.
He said he couldn’t do that in case the steering lock engaged and the whole thing turned over.
So they sent seven police cars to clear a path in front of the truck.
And for 100 miles it barrelled uncontrollably on.
Eventually the end of the motorway came in sight.
The out-of-control lorry was going to plough into Staples Corner.
With all the traffic on the North Circular road it would be carnage.
So Michael Rayner took a chance.
He turned off the engine and steered the lorry into the crash barrier.
Finally it came to a halt.
Many lives were saved and Michael Rayner was a hero.
Except.
The lorry was checked by the manufacturers.
And they found that the accelerator wasn’t jammed at all.
It normally limited the truck to 56mph, but it had been overridden.
Plus the brakes were found to be working perfectly.
So if there was no problem with the truck, what happened?
It was discovered that six months earlier Michael Rayner had been diagnosed with “Munchausen’s Syndrome by Proxy”.
This is a condition whereby the sufferer invents a perilous situation no one else can solve.
Eventually they manage to solve it and become a hero.
Michael Rayner was charged with dangerous driving.
The police case was that he simulated the disaster in order to be a hero.
You find a lot of “Munchausen’s Syndrome by Proxy” in advertising and marketing.
A respected senior planner told me the advice he’d been given by his boss on his first day on the job.
He said “Remember, it’s your job to make the client believe that this is an incredibly complicated problem, and you’re the only person that can solve it.”
That must be the reason we speak in a language ordinary people can’t understand.
Because if it sounds too simple, they’ll think anyone can do it.
We’ve got to make it sound like a complicated marketing problem no one can solve.
And the more complicated the language, the more complex the problem sounds.
The client needs the only person who can guide them through it.
The client needs a hero.
Making clients believe they need a hero to solve an incredibly complicated problem hasn’t worked has it?
Nowadays many clients seem to think that, because they know their brand / product, they know how to advertise it.
“It’s going to be big.”
Dave,
If you have a moment, perhaps you’d like to take a look at this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D41rO7mL6zM
Dave that is a great post.
Why turn to lucidity and clarity when you can outsmart your clients with ephemerous but seemingly meaningful bullshit?
My own golden rule is that we first establish the ‘exam’ question that truly and clearly defines strategy.
Then set about answering the right question, not the wrong ones.
Good advice Brian
A fish doesn’t know it lives in water.
Hands on hot stoves and beautiful women or E=mc² Einstein knew he nailed it and made relativity relevant to his audience.
If I’ve understood you correctly the self ingratiated experts build the jungle around them. Then clear the path.
Because life isn’t exciting enough tiles and roles are created with similar hyperbole.
Candour is seen as challenge. Complex things don’t need to be complicated.
Beginning, middle, end.
Hook, build, pay-off.
Cha cha cha.
Want or not?
Is this you?
Hi Jon,
I was talking with a couple of students who are IT experts last night about Binary Code and whether the Chinese Language will make a dent in the English language’s domination of the internet. We basically agreed that the Binary Code is no more than a series of utterances no more complex than cave men.
So it seems we still have a long way to go, and so do the Chinese
Example (Just for fun) of where we stand right now.
UG UG OK UG 0 0 1 0
UG UG UG UG 0 0 0 0
OK UG UG OK = 1 0 0 1
OK OK OK UG 1 1 1 0
UG OK UG OK 1 0 1 0
So may be an example of one one of the jungles we have built around us.
There may come a day when there won’t be enough nought’s and ones to collate and memorise all the collected data.
That should be fun.
OOOXOOOO