In 1863, the superstars of French painting were: Adolph Bouguereau, Paul Delariche, Alexander Cabanel, Jean-Louise-Ernest Meissonier, and Lawrence Alma-Tadema.
They were going to be the artists who would be remembered in 100 years’ time.
The artists who would have galleries and museums dedicated to them.
So how come we never heard of any of them?
It’s the result of thinking that became just a set of rules.
When thinking, in fact, stops being thinking.
In Paris, in 1863, the rules for art were set by the Academie des Beaux Arts.
This was the body that decided what was, and wasn’t, art.
Every year, all artists submitted their work to the Academie des Beaux Arts for judgement.
The Academie des Beaux Arts decided which paintings were worthy of being included in the official exhibition, the annual “Salon”.
If you were selected, like the names above, you were made and your paintings would sell for a fortune.
If not, you were nobody.
But the Academie des Beaux Arts had very strict rules.
All painting must feature precise draughtsmanship, subject matter must be either religious, historical, allegorical, or portraits.
And they should be painted formally, in a studio.
But a group of young painters had begun painting outdoors.
They were actually painting in the open air.
They were painting real, ordinary people doing everyday things.
So the Academie des Beaux Arts refused to show their work.
And in 1863 there were a record number of rejections from the Salon.
It caused an outcry.
So much so, that it was agreed the decision would be vindicated by allowing the rejects to be ridiculed in the “Salon des Refuses”.
But actually this had the opposite effect.
People could see that this new type of art was fresh and exciting.
Full of real life, real colour and real people, not just dead art.
But The Academie des Beaux Arts decreed it wasn’t proper painting at all.
It was merely capturing an impression.
And the term “Impressionism” was born.
In 1874, 30 of those rejected artists had their own exhibition.
Among the rejects were: Claude Monet, Edouard Manet, Paul Cezanne, Edgar Degas, Auguste Renoir, Berthe Morisot.
Of course they became the ones who had the galleries dedicated to them.
The ‘rejects’ are remembered and the chosen celebrities are forgotten.
The Academie de Beaux Arts didn’t survive long either.
With the advent of the new wave of modern art, it became redundant.
That’s what happens when a group of people try to dictate behaviour to everyone else.
Just the way advertising thinking is dictated at present.
Conventional wisdom decides what is the only acceptable formula.
Just like the Academie des Beaux Arts, it dictates what can and can’t be done.
And just like the Academie des Beaux Arts it’s suffocating creativity.
I recently read a quote about this in the Financial Times:
“In the long run, an industry hostile to new ideas and talent will either die or be reinvented.”
I think this is overdue to happen to the Academie des Advertising.
Touché.
This reminds me of a story I heard.
In the ad industry, there’s this organisation that decides what is good advertising and what isn’t.
It used to run a course for students who wanted to get into the industry, open to everyone, regardless of experience.
But the course got very popular so, to reduce numbers, they decided to start vetting the students’ portfolios.
And only take the best ones.
The bloke running the course thought this was out of order.
That it was elitist.
Totally against the spirit of the course.
So, on the sly, he started his own course.
Called it the “Advertising Rejects Course”.
And took all the people the Establishment said were no good.
Told them to keep their mouths shut and do what he said.
And he’d make sure they got more jobs than the people on the official course.
And you know what? It worked.
Next year, people would turn up for the Rejects Course, even though they’d been accepted onto the official Establishment course.
And in years to come, these “rejects” would become the toast of the advertising industry.
Winning all the awards.
They all had one person to thank.
That maverick course leader who decided to reject the Establishment and set up his own “Salon des Refuses”.
Now I forget the bloke’s name.
If anyone remembers, perhaps you can remind me.
Graham Fink?
@Nick. Where’s the
Like button when we really need it?
Oh wait, I remember …
http://davetrott.co.uk/2011/11/fail-upwards
JO’D: I was just reading your interview with Dave Dye — especially liked the bit where you met the “part time flour grader” and he told you his plans for the future!
Fuck the Academie des Advertising.
Brought to mind “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.” (Arthur Schopenhauer).
I suspect having spent a couple of weeks one summer with http://www.tonycullingham.com – he’s is not part of Academie des Advertising.
what is interesting is kinda the reverse in advertising at least as far as the latest function of planning is concerned
ANYBODY yes ANYBODY can become a planner – except those who are ‘qualified’ or genuinely interested in advertising. ad agencies have recruited housewives, ex-media, photographers, cooks, school drop-outs etc. as advertising planners which is not wrong as a concept
But there’s rejection of a few sets of people – like market researchers for e.g. (and curiously market research is a part of advertising industry)
Its the same exclusion principle here again.
Change always has been brought when you bring in someone new from the outside.
In the case of advertising perhaps they need to start bringing in people from the inside for once?
Hi, Dave Trott
I am reaching out to you on behalf of Ravi Naidoo, Founder and Curator of Design Indaba, Africa’s largest creative platform.
Ravi will be in London from 7th – 9th May and would like to meet with you to discuss a potential collaboration with Design Indaba.
To give you a little context, Design Indaba was born out of an optimistic post-1994 South Africa and it heralds the power of creativity, innovation and design for solving the problems faced by an emerging economy. We are agents for social change who envisage a better world through creativity. We believe that by exposing people to forward-thinking ideas we can inspire and equip them to make great things happen. By facilitating this process we champion a drive for creative revolution.
Please do let me know your availability to meet with Ravi in London between 7th and 9th May.
Warm regards,
Robyn
Ryan, It’s why Advertising is in such a mess now. They threw the baby out with the bathwater. Everyone is looking at Margins and time sheets. Creative Departments should be renamed as Tech-No Accounts. I was discussing this with a few students the other day. Attribution error is biting Adland on the ass. All us veterans can and have seen it a mile off. Yes, if you’re a housewife or a plumber, you probably know more about branding than a Planner because they’ve all been processed at University to come up with the same answer. All the real planners are dead and gone. Ask any brand what The Meaning of the Universe is and they’ll all give you the same number because they are all processed by the same machine named Algebra Numbskull. There’s not a free thinker left anywhere. I call it Post-EU Atomic Fall-Out. Everyone’s infected with nonsense. My new mobile rings every second with mindless notifications. All I wanted was a phone that I can have A. Call, B. Text, C. Camera. The rest is all social TRIPE and it’s warping everyones brains with WHITE NOISE. Advertising hasn’t a cat in Hell’s chance of cutting through all this Pollution unless if it is Original and no committee of accountant bean counters has ever allowed anything original through because they do not understand original. The Academie des Advertising only understands backslaps and it goes on everywhere. Advertising has become a stultified perineum of suppositories and now they have the audacity to say “I’ve found something new!” (when what they have really discovered is something old). Not impressed. Now, toddle off and come up with something else. (Thanks Dave.)
Oh, you’ll love this phrase Dave,
“WE ARE WALKING INTO THE FUTURE BACKWARDS”.
“If you don’t like what they’re saying, change the conversation”
“Salon des Refuses”. Is this what the Golden Raspberry Awards were modelled on?
“Salon des Refuses” was what a whole movement of Art was modelled on which broke the boring mould of painting rich families’ dead people forever. replacing it with real life. The problem with advertisers is they think people think the same thoughts as them and they don’t as Pepsi, Heal’s infamous doomed Twitter discount furniture promotion and Coca~Cola’s Online Disaster proved. Creativity is an Art not a Science.
…apologies. Was an art.
I like to receive your releases regularly.
Thanks.
Wim
I like to receive your news releases in future.
Thanks.
Wim
I love to stay connected.
Can you add me to your database.
Thanks,
Wim
“For the most part, the art that resulted was staid and predictable, painted by skilled but anonymous technicians” And there it is.