I was at the Tate Modern looking at an artwork by Susan Hiller.
It was a series of photographs of Victorian memorial stones.
Each one commemorated someone who died while performing an act of heroism.
One in particular struck me: “Elizabeth Boxall aged 17 of Bethnal Green, who died of injuries received in trying to save a child from a runaway horse, June 20 1888”.
The reason this struck me was my dad always saved a newspaper clipping from the 1930s, about his big brother, Tom.
Dad and Uncle Tom were both policemen.
Dad was really proud that Uncle Tom had been on point duty, directing traffic, when a runaway horse came tearing down the street.
Everyone scattered because they were terrified.
But Uncle Tom threw his arms round the horse’s neck and hung on, dragging his boots along the road.
The weight began to turn the horse until it ran straight into a plate glass window.
Uncle Tom and the horse ended up covered in glass inside the shop.
But no one else was hurt at all.
Dad always saved this newspaper clipping, he was very proud of it.
I never could understand why he thought it was such a big deal, or why the papers even reported it.
When I was young there were hardly any horses around, so I never saw a runaway horse just gentle old nags.
But that memorial stone at the Tate Modern made me think of what horses were like in a different time.
Before cars or lorries, every vehicle was powered by horses.
In 1894 for instance, London buses alone used fifty thousand horses and there were eleven thousand horse-drawn cabs.
Each horse created up to thirty-five pounds of manure a day.
That meant a quarter of a million tons of manure on the streets every year.
That’s what happens when every vehicle is horse-drawn.
In 1909 eighteen people were killed by runaway horses.
In 1913 Emily Davison, the suffragette, died when she threw herself in front of the King’s horse at Epsom.
The purpose of the cavalry in war was to crush the enemy.
Ranks of armed men would break and run rather than be trampled.
A runaway horse was a ton of muscle moving at thirty miles an hour.
And once that amount of muscle was moving it was very hard to stop it.
But Uncle Tom, a young east end copper, thought he could.
That was why he threw his arms round the horse’s neck and held on.
That’s how he stopped it killing anyone.
And that’s why Dad always kept that clipping from the newspaper.
And it suddenly made sense to me in the Tate Modern.
I realised we can’t judge things by our own standards.
From my perspective throwing your arms round a horse made no sense.
Why not just let the horse run until it’s worn itself out?
But many years earlier that wasn’t the way it worked
If it was left to run it would almost certainly plough into a crowd of people and kill someone.
Their world wasn’t my world.
That’s a good lesson for anyone in the communications business.
We can’t judge a thing from our context, we have to judge it from the context it belongs in.
Dave, great story. bravo uncle Tom! one of the proudest moments of my life was when I stopped a runaway horse on Central Park south simply by stepping in front of it and putting my hand up and shouting at it. Its carriage had bizarrely split in half seconds before. i think i caught it just in time. I grabbed it by the bridle and said soothing words to it. The thing about horses is that they used be prey animals. Their reaction to most things that bother them is to run away in terror. Driving a carriage is mostly an exercise in pulling the horse towards the things that frighten them.
There you are Vinny, you could have been a copper in London in the 1930s
Your uncle had the right idea. Always go for a large (noncarnivorous!) animal’s head. This is why you take a bull ‘by the horns.’
You should, however, make it clearer that war horses are huge, much larger than the horses we have now. Clydesdale huge.
Hi Dave, I’d never heard of Susan Hillier, So I looked her up as I couldn’t understand why you’d want to go to an exhibition full of gravestones or why on earth Susan Hillier felt a compulsion to photograph them? If it’s the same Susan Hiller, the one that came to the UK in the 60’s from Florida, it seems she did an exhibition on ‘irrationality’ at some time. Also looking at her work, it seems she may have been the inspiration behind Damien Hirst. To me, that explains her work. I also couldn’t understand your headline. ‘Hold one’ Yes, there’s the obvious meaning, then there’s the double meaning, but I wondered how this related to the artist and advertising and found this explanation of ‘irrationality’ fascinating because that’s exactly what’s missing in advertising today. There’s no ‘irrationality’ there is no instantaneousness, everything is dull and boring and been done before, but it hasn’t as Susan Hillier demonstrates. If I could have had £1 for the number of times I heard, or in my latter years said, “It’s been done before”, from a creative director, I’d be a very rich man. So hopefully the next time a creative sees a poster for an exhibition and thinks ‘What is that all about?’ Their curiosity will get the better of them and they will GO and HAVE A LOOK like you did rather than just sit at a computer terminal and hope to pinch some limp idea off the internet (that has clearly already been done).
Spot on Kev
Hi Dave, off topic, but spotted this on https://scarfolk.blogspot.com/ It’s supposedly a NW town which hasn’t moved on from the 70s. Very funny writing and the ‘amended’ book covers (a la Joes Orton) are brilliant. The post on 6th April may amuse (or not)…
@Tom C: Thanks for the link. I’ve not laughed so much for ages.